Living differently

I actually enjoy service. I enjoy organizing events and troubleshooting climate-related stuff. It helps me feel connected and relevant. However, I have become increasingly aware of the different lifestyles between people who “see problems and try to solve them” versus people who “do not see problems”. I’d like to record some of these differences and…

Course Idea: Historical Method in Philosophy and Science

I think a lot about how and why philosophers of science do historical research. I am working on a series of papers about the relationship between the hows and whys of a particular kind of philosopher of science–those who want (something like) a theory of scientific methodology so as to guide to contemporary practice. However, this…

A case against talents

I went to a career workshop recently. The theme was that we should identify our strengths through some paid questionnaire service and structure our careers around them in some way (we didn’t get to the career part). In general, I’m not a big fan of this sort of career testing because I don’t think the…

Is data special?

This post is inspired by a twitter thread on whether you should trust a summary statistic (mean/ standard deviation/ Pearson’s correlation coefficient) without seeing a plot. Most people voted “no”, which seems to be motivated by a sentiment that accepting summary statistics without seeing the plot is trusting too much. See the full thread below.…

“the fundamental lexical hypothesis”, universal personality traits, and umami

The universal trait hypothesis Like many other psychology students, I was taught that “the various human traits and characters can be captured by five basic traits: conscientiousness, extroversion, emotional stability, openness-to-experience, agreeableness.” As someone who is not, by nature, very reflective, I never questioned what “can be captured” meant or how this caption was done.…